Thursday, 30 June 2011
Why Kings of Leon ARE NOT shit
"It's time for a party and I'm pretty drunk already!" exclaimed Caleb Followill in his thick Tennessee drawl on the first night of Kings of Leons double header at Hyde Park last Wednesday. Well I was there mate, and it was pretty fucking from where I was stood.
A set that spanned their 5 albums, which was loyal to old fans whilst pleasing to the new crowd, which was bursting to the seams with hits from Spiral Staircase to Closer, Mollys Chambers to Back Down South. It's too early for talk of a greatest hits album, but KOL have more than enough material should their record company come knocking.
I put myself firmly in the "old fan" camp. Now I'm not saying I foresaw them becoming the most important band of their generation back in 2003 when they released Youth and Young Manhood: I remember seeing a young Kings of Leon at Glastonbury in 2003 and I liked what i saw, but back then there were so many good bands around that I didn't expect for one minute that in 8 years time the Kings would be top of the pile whilst most of their contemporaries fell by the waist-side.
The Strokes took a break from each-other whilst the Libertines almost killed each-other. Craig from the Vines had a nervous breakdown and The Thrills, well, what did happen to the Thrills actually?!
Still, it is KOL that now feast at the top table of rock, stroking the neatly trimmed facial hair of fellow mega-bands U2, Coldplay and Foo Fighters. From scruffy Southern American garage band, to stadium filling heart-throbs in the space of half a decade, they might tell you they've done "alright", such is their modesty and laid-back demeanour.
But its not all peace, love and bananas where their "loyal" fan base is concerned. Their last 2 albums have been met with mixed reviews, mainly from those who remember them playing in the sweaty clubs on the UK circuit with affection, yearning for a return to those good old days.
Some fans claim KOL have sold out and adopted a more commercial sound to gain more mainstream success, sacrificing their original, edgy sound for a more radio friendly one, for increased album sales and for more bums on packed-out stadium seats.
Well, have they got a point?
Firstly, let's look at the subject matter of their songs. KOL are unashamed advocates of the "rock out with your cock out" cliche, and always have been. It's a recurring theme throughout their first two records; so many of their early songs are literally about sex and drugs and rock n roll, and their early fan base could relate to that, because that's all they were interested in doing as well, right?
But you can't write about that for the rest of your life, can you? Eventually shagging groupies in the toilets at Shepherd Bush Empire becomes tiresome (apparently), so what do you write about after that then?
And its not as though their songs are completely clean-cut now. Back Down South from their latest album, Come Around Sundown talks about "Pretty Little girls, naked to their curves laying in a coffin" for Christ's sake!
Every artist wants to develop. Only Oasis would have been happy churning out 10 replicas of their first album, Definitely Maybe. Kings of Leon have endured because they have developed as they have written more material. Instead of only wishing to repeat past glories, they have strived create new ones. If their subject matter has evolved it is just a sign that they're growing up and evolving as people and as musicians, rather than selling out.
Then there's their sound, which is undoubtedly more polished then it was on Youth & Young Manhood and Aha Shake Heartbreak. KOL started life as a garage band. They recorded their albums live, that's to say they all played in the same room, with each instrument individually micced up. As a result, you get "spillage", i.e. each instruments microphone picks up the background noise of the other instruments. This gives a warmer, liver sound to the recording, but as a result it's harder to mix as you can't treat one sound without affecting the sound of another. What your left with is a recording that is true to the bands live performance and very raw. No studio effects. No gimmicks.
Some might say this is a preferred sound for a band, and for this band in particular, staying true to their garage roots, but what you gonna do? Kings of Leon are worth millions now, they're hardly going to record in primitive conditions when they've got state of the art studios at their disposal. If someone buys you a Ferrari, you don't keep it in the garage and drive your old Rover Metro around do you?
You can see the fruits of the high-tech studio work on tracks like Closer and Crawl on Only By The Night: Elaborate effects which sound more like keyboard loops than they do guitar riffs. In addition, songs like Sex on Fire, whilst maintaining that rockier feel of their earlier records, also sound like they were recorded with the instruments split out and recorded separately. The recording style and post-production is more clinical, hence the cleaner sound.
The final thing I'd like to mention is Caleb's fantastic voice. I read an interview once in which he stated that up until Only By The Night he had never really "sang" on a KOL record, just screamed or shouted. When you listen to their early albums, he employs a strained yelp almost, that fits perfectly with the bands sound at that time. Listen to Spiral Staircase off Youth and Young Manhood and you'll hear an archetypal Caleb vocal for the early years.
Nowadays there is more melody to his voice. He caresses the melody rather than rips it apart. I'm not saying I prefer the latter, I personally love his vocal on songs like Charmer, where each lyric is proceeded with a high pitch scream, but there are two distinct styles there. The change in vocal delivery shows an increased maturity to the singer I guess, perhaps its not as rock n roll, but whatever, he's got a great voice that suits a number of styles; there's no point him screaming out the lyrics on a track like Revelry now is there?
All this is sung to a backdrop of perhaps the finest rhythm section rock n roll has seen since Nirvana and a guitarist that is so diverse in style that it fits any song Kings choose to write. He can play slide, as on Back Down South, fantastic solos, a la Mollys Chambers, and out and out riffing, as displayed on most of Because Of The Times.
On Sunday 26th June at Glastonbury Beyonce covered "Sex on Fire" by the Kings of Leon. The boys from Tennessee who played the New Bands Tent at the 2003 Glastonbury festival are undoubtedly mainstream now, but they've not sold out. They've grown up a bit, and are driving fast cars and using high tech gear in the studio, but that doesn't mean they've abandoned their musical philosophy.
The Kings of Leon could easily go down as our generations Rolling Stones, we should celebrate that rather than put them down for making something of their lives.
Good luck boys. Enjoy the ride.
Wednesday, 8 June 2011
Rio versus Ollie: Social Media in Sport
Last night on Twitter I read with interest and intrigue as Rio Ferdinand tore strips off journalist Ollie Holt for divulging the contents of a Direct Message Rio had sent Holt a few days earlier, which contained such profanities as "You fat prick". Just so you know, a Direct Message is essentially a private email sent through Twitter that only the sender and recipient can see. Holt divulged the contents of this private message to his sizeable following, hence Rio's fury.
Holt took exception to the "fat" chat and the insults ("Rio owns an Italian restaurant, what do you think they serve, salad?"), saying that his friends thought it was really bad what Rio had written in his DM, and that his mum was going to have a word with Rio's mum about it.
The question of whether it was appropriate for Holt to publish a private message in this way has been raised and sure, that's worth a debate, but so is the question of where this feud has all stemmed from in the first place?
Well, Holt had decided to query why Rio had missed the now infamous drug test that ended up with him being suspended for 8 months....back in 2003. Quite why he felt that this story was worth re-visiting here in 2011 is anyone's guess.
Apparently we are lead to believe that Holt began looking at the story prior to England's game with Switzerland at Wembley on Saturday, and Rio's "prick" email was sent to Holt prior to that match, having heard about the story.
Holt then quizzed Ferdinand on the subject in the mixed zone, an area where journalists line up to ask players questions after the game against the Swiss. Holt told us in his article in the Mirror that he was standing by the exit, so Rio had little option but to speak to him on the way out. Rio looked in a mood; as well he might, having been involved in such a drab stalemate.
What followed was a lively debate which resulted in Holt asserting to Ferdinand that he should have taken the drug test 8 years previously. Go figure.
Holts piece tells us that Lance Armstrong is standing trial for doping allegations. Oh, so is that why we're raking up Rio's past failings then?
Rio missed his test and got an 8 month suspension. He's done his time, why drag it up again now?
For good measure, Holt also dropped in the odd insult, affirming that yes Ferdinand was run ragged against Barcelona last week and that he was also at fault for the first Swiss goal at Wembley on Saturday. I think he also alleges Rio is sleeping with his wife, but obviously there's a super-injunction out against that, so I can't really talk about that story.
I'm all for free speech and to be fair to Holt, players really ought to be careful with what they say to journalists, whether it's on the record or not.
What does annoy me though is when a player who's done his time and apologised for mistakes he's made in the past is still getting grief for it years after the event actually took place from a journalist who clearly has an ulterior motive.
It's not relevant anymore Ollie, the football season is over now, go on holiday or watch some cricket or something.
Holt may have fancied a bit of publicity and thought, "It's a long time until the new season starts, everyone will have forgotten about this by then", but I wouldn't expect too many Manchester United exclusives from the Mirror next term as a result of this non-story.
Still, at least Holt's name is on the tip of everyones lips; he'll doubtless be back on Sky Sports' Sunday Supplement next season, so I'm sure he's happy about that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)